The Most Important Curve in Finance
If you could only learn one mathematical concept before starting in quantitative finance, it should be the exponential function. That is not hyperbole. Compound interest, continuous discounting, option pricing, bond yields, population growth models, radioactive decay — they all rest on ( e^x ) and its inverse, ( \ln(x) ).
Euler's number ( e \approx 2.71828 ) is not some arbitrary constant pulled from a hat. It emerges naturally whenever something grows proportionally to its current size. Money earning interest on interest. A virus spreading through a population. A feedback loop in a trading algorithm. The pattern is always the same: exponential growth (or decay).
Compound Interest — Where It All Starts
If you invest £1,000 at 5% annual interest, after one year you have ( 1000 \times 1.05 = £1,050 ). After two years, it is ( 1000 \times 1.05^2 = £1,102.50 ). That extra £2.50 is interest on the interest. Compounding.
Increase the compounding frequency — monthly, daily, every second — and you approach a limit:
[ A = P \cdot e^{rt} ]
This is continuous compounding. It is the mathematical idealisation that makes the maths cleaner, and it is standard in derivatives pricing. The time value of money module digs into this in detail.
Why does everyone in quant finance use continuous compounding? Because the exponential function has a gorgeous property: the derivative of ( e^{rt} ) with respect to ( t ) is just ( r \cdot e^{rt} ). The rate of growth at any moment is proportional to the current value. This makes calculus vastly simpler.
The Natural Logarithm — Undoing Growth
The natural logarithm ( \ln(x) ) is the inverse of ( e^x ). If the exponential asks "how much do I get after growing at rate ( r ) for time ( t )?", the logarithm asks "what growth rate would produce this outcome?"
[ \text{If } FV = PV \cdot e^{rT}, \text{ then } r = \frac{\ln(FV / PV)}{T} ]
This is how you back out implied interest rates, implied volatility, and growth rates from observed data.
Log Returns — The Quant's Preferred Return Measure
There are two ways to measure a stock return:
Simple return: ( R = \frac{S_{t+1} - S_t}{S_t} )
Log return: ( r = \ln\left(\frac{S_{t+1}}{S_t}\right) )
Why do quants almost universally prefer log returns?
- They are additive over time. The log return over two days is the sum of the daily log returns. Try that with simple returns — it does not work.
- They are approximately normally distributed for short intervals. This underpins the Black-Scholes model and much of statistical modelling.
- They are symmetric. A 50% gain followed by a 50% loss in simple returns is a net loss. In log returns, equal and opposite moves cancel.
This is not a minor preference. The entire mathematical framework of portfolio theory, risk measurement, and derivatives pricing relies on additive, roughly normal returns. Log returns deliver that.
Exponential Growth and Decay in Practice
Growth: Reinvested Returns
If a fund compounds at 8% annually:
- After 10 years: ( e^{0.08 \times 10} = e^{0.8} \approx 2.23 \times ) initial investment
- After 30 years: ( e^{0.08 \times 30} = e^{2.4} \approx 11.02 \times )
The Rule of 72 is a quick mental shortcut: divide 72 by the interest rate to estimate how many years it takes to double. At 8%, that is roughly 9 years.
Decay: Discounting Future Cash Flows
The discount factor ( e^{-rT} ) tells you what a future pound is worth today. At 5% over 10 years: ( e^{-0.5} \approx 0.607 ). A pound received in 10 years is worth about 61p today. Bond pricing is fundamentally about summing discounted cash flows.
Decay: Option Time Value
Options lose value as expiry approaches — theta decay. The time value component decays roughly as ( \sqrt{T} ), and the discounting uses ( e^{-rT} ). Both are exponential-family functions. The Greeks module explores this in depth.
The Exponential Function in the Wild
You will bump into ( e^x ) constantly:
| Context | Formula | What It Does |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous compounding | ( PV \cdot e^{rT} ) | Grows money forward |
| Discounting | ( FV \cdot e^{-rT} ) | Brings money backward |
| Black-Scholes | ( S N(d_1) - K e^{-rT} N(d_2) ) | Prices European options |
| Survival probability | ( e^{-\lambda T} ) | Probability of no default |
| Normal distribution | ( \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-x^2/2} ) | The bell curve itself |
The exponential is genuinely the Swiss Army knife of quantitative finance.
Series Expansions — A Brief Mention
For small ( x ), we have ( e^x \approx 1 + x ). This approximation is used constantly: if the daily interest rate is 0.02%, then ( e^{0.0002} \approx 1.0002 ). Close enough for most purposes, and much faster to compute.
This idea generalises into Taylor expansions, which are essential for understanding the Greeks. When a trader says "delta is the first-order approximation of option price change," they are doing a Taylor expansion, whether they realise it or not.
Getting Hands-On
Reading about exponentials is useful. Computing with them is better. NumPy and Pandas make it trivial to calculate log returns, compound growth factors, and discount factors across entire datasets.
If you want structured practice — interactive exercises, quizzes, and Python challenges that build from ( e^x ) all the way to pricing models — Quantt covers the full journey from foundations to finance. All the maths, all the code, all connected.
The exponential function is one of those things that once you really get, you start seeing everywhere. And in quant finance, you really do see it everywhere.
Want to go deeper on Exponentials and Logarithms: Why Finance Cannot Live Without Them?
This article covers the essentials, but there's a lot more to learn. Inside Quantt, you'll find hands-on coding exercises, interactive quizzes, and structured lessons that take you from fundamentals to production-ready skills — across 50+ courses in technology, finance, and mathematics.
Free to get started · No credit card required